| Below
are my Letters written to the Globe and Mail in 2004. Yellow
underlined passages indicate they were published in the paper
or on-line the following day. ( as one can see, many are culled but
few are chosen.) Letters submitted in later years may be
viewed by clicking the appropriate year above. |
| Give
them a chance Anthony
Oluwatoyin (letter -- April 2) says Canadian-content rules promote
what is Canadian at the expense of quality. I
worked in radio when CanCon was introduced in 1970. I remember how
few artists we had and how repetitive and difficult it was to meet
the quota. It took a while, but the talent grew, improved and
excelled. Artists must have the chance to improve. April 3, 2004
|
| Healthier
lifestyle Regarding
the letter from D. F. Osmaston about hearty breakfasts (Saved His
Bacon -- April 10): I wonder if it's not the hot breakfast, but
rather the early hours, hard physical labour, fresh air and slower
pace of life that made people more fit then. Also, the time taken to
have a hot breakfast speaks to pace of living. What is today a
healthy lifestyle choice was back then just another day. April
12, 2004 |
| The
right to secede William
Johnson is perhaps being scrupulously correct but missing the
political point. Social union is a political more than a legal
relationship. Once the right to negotiate secession has been
granted, the moral right and political authority would eventually
win out. Had the Yes side won
last time, is there any doubt Quebec would have become sovereign by
now? April 21, 2004 |
| Stephen
What? Re
yesterday's many letters about Joe Clark's recent comments: Has it
come to this? A sincere caution and forthright opinion are viewed as
sour grapes and treachery. It strikes me that, in politics, if you do
the wrong thing, you might get chastised. But if you do the right
thing, they'll nail you every time.
April 28, 2004 |
| Strange
Logic If
Colin Gruchy (letter -- May 20 ) had suffered a medical emergency in
the past, I assume he would have availed himself of the tax-paid
health-care system in Ontario. When his local government has to
raise taxes to pay for fire-fighting equipment, will Mr. Gruchy burn
his house down? Governments are
in the business of health insurance, not health care. Premiums are a
form of tax to pay for that system.
May 21, 2004 |
| Wish
we were there I disagree with the
assumption of Chris Baker (If It Ain't Broke -- on-line edition, May
20) that the people don't like the "horse trading" of
minority governments. Such trades may accommodate needs that would
otherwise never be met. As
to the effectiveness of majority government, I am not so sure we
want the task of governing us to be too easy. That might lead to us
being taken for granted and to the arrogance of the "natural
governing party." May
25, 2004 |
| After
reading two main page stories in the Globe & Mail this morning (
US trading terrorists for Sampson and calls for Arar
file to be made public ) I can only conclude that there are two terrorist
threats to the “ Homeland” : one comes from far away but the other is
indigenous: our own governments.
This
war on terror is scary, any way you look at it. July 5, 2004
|
| John Ibbitson contends
Canada should sign on to the US missile defense scheme; that to not
do so would be ceding our sovereignty because the Americans will do what they
want anyway. It
may be expedient to give your lunch money to a schoolyard bully, but
that doesn’t make it right nor does it enhance your dignity. It
only encourages the bully to press on. July
8, 2004 |
|
But
do they exist? In
answer to Jack MacLelland’s question
( what label for
one who faithfully believes there is no God ), may
I suggest
“
Orthodox Nonitarian “
? July
10, 2004
|
| Mr.
Khadr complains that he has not gotten the recognition he deserves
for his purported service to the
US
as a spy. He also is
shocked that the Canadian government is withholding passport
privileges to him and his family.
Simple solution: let the Khadrs
leave but only to the
United
States
where, I am sure, their well publicized views will get them the
reception they so richly deserve
July
12, 2004 |
|
When
I first heard Peel Police Chief Catney’s
press conference on radio, I wondered where the word ‘alleged’
was. Had I missed it? Later,
on TV I saw Chief Catney point to the
photo of a man who was named and referred to as the murderer.
Not ‘ the one alleged or accused
‘ , just the one who
had done it.
Am I missing something here? Like a trial. July
24, 2004
|
| So
the Russians think former PM Jean Chretien
has the stature to help resolve their corruption / government
intervention scandal. Are
they after his respectable stature or his expert advice?
The might be wise to await the results of the Canadian
inquiry into the Sponsorship Scandal before banking on Chretien’s
good reputation. July
29, 2004 |
|
If
Rex Murphy needs an insight into the hatred for George W. Bush among
many Americans, he has but to read “
Bushwhacked” by Molly Ivins. She
gives reasons for loathing not only Dubya,
but that entire neo-con cadre of corrupt cronies, crackpots and
crooks. Ivins
points to the ongoing destruction of Texan and
U.S.
economies, environmental protection, education, food safety,
and more issues near and dear to the people because of
Bush II policies. Further, Ivins
contends the American people, especially the poor, are paying a
heavy price to benefit GWB’s rich and powerful
friends and financial supporters.
Then
there’s foreign policy. Then
there’s the dismantling of the US Constitution. Then there’s war
with dubious cause.
These
are reasons to put Bush behind the “ hate
ball ” But for
the cause beyond reason, we have another factor and her name is Pfc.
Lynndie
England
.
Americans think of themselves and their way of life, their
values only in superlatives. They
take for granted they are the best; Pfc.
England
showed them at their worst in a graphic way the American culture
machine could understand. Molly Ivins
chronicled facts and statistics, did the hard research
and made her argument.
Pfc.
England
drew them a picture. July
31, 2004
|
|
Lawrence
Martin indicates that George W Bush’s terror alerts, as specious
as they may be now, will some day come true even if it is something
as simple as a car bomb in a
U.S.
city. I fear this will happen before November’s
US
elections and that the terrorist perpetrators are deliberately
planning to keep Bush and his neo-con cronies in the White House.
Osama bin Laden’s
cause
is better advanced with a Bush presidency.
Or it could be Bush will repeat history in a (
second ) illegitimate grab for power;
remember the burning of the Reichstag?
Fear gets the job done; ask any fascist. August 6, 2004
|
|
Letter
writer Gerald Faucher writes “It's
time society placed the blame and responsibility firmly where it
belongs, at the feet of the only person responsible for Ms.
England
's actions, Ms.
England
herself.” We might
add, “ and the people running the jail
and intelligence operation who gave her the idea ( orders ? ). August
7, 2004
|
|
Norman
Spector writes that Roy Romano does not
suggest public service wage controls, an option available to the
Federal Government to curb rising health costs, i.e. regulation.
He implies the
former NDP premier wouldn’t want to upset the unions. Another way
to regulate health
costs in, for instance a federally assisted pharmicare
program, would be to
reduce the time multi-national Drug Lords hold patents; then generic
drugs could be purchased more cheaply.
But I don’t suppose taking on the International
Drug Industry is
an option Norman Spector would think of.
August 9, 2004
|
|
John
Barber’s column lectures us bumpkins who are concerned about the
fate of
Toronto
’s
garbage. It’s been said that one measure of a people’s
civilization is the distance between its garbage and itself.
Maybe that’s why Mr. Barber
thinks Torontonians are so civilized while the rest of us are
bumpkins.
And you wonder why the rest of
Canada
loves to hate
Toronto
?
August 10, 2004
|
|
Letter
writer Van Sommerfeld’s says if
government investment in the tobacco industry is wrong, so too are
taxes on their products. I disagree.
The
moral point turns on the effect of the two actions.
The wrong lies in promoting an unhealthy and potentially
lethal activity among the general population, something to be
eschewed by government. Investing promotes the industry, heavy
taxing discourages product use, especially among the young, which is
the industry’s vital market (
irony intended ).
The unequivocal moral stance would be prohibition. Not
likely in my lifetime.
August 21, 2004
|
|
Ken
O’Brien rightly calls photo radar ‘ a
sensible use of technology ‘ which
reduces speeding on our highways and subsequent injury or death. Sensible,
yes. But if we
used good sense, we wouldn’t need such devices. And we are all
speedsters and we none of us want to get caught.
We all slow down when we see a cop car on the horizon or in
the rear view mirror but speed up again once the threat of being
caught has past.
We all want to be ‘ under the
radar ‘ when we act un-sensibly; even
if that means greater danger on our highways. August 26,
2004
|
|
Your
editorial tries to shoot down arguments against the
US
anti-missile program. You missed.
You point out that Ronald Reagan’s Star Wars 1 led to the
development of the Patriot missile.
And this is a good thing? Reviews I’ve seen show the
missile had very limited success and its track record was
white-washed by the military.
Star Wars 2 will prove to be more boondoggle than boon with the
Texas Oil / Texas War machine urging their Texas President to divert
tax dollars from government for the people to war toys for the good ol’
boys.
I cannot think of a better example of what Eisenhower referred to as
‘ the military-industrial complex’. August
27, 2004
|
|
A
reading of Molly Ivvins portraits of the
Texan tyrant will show him as no Churchill.
When
you consider the massive tax relief to the upper class and
manufactured wars that benefit the oil / military industrial
complex, a more apt saying is, “Never has one president done so
much for so few.” September 2, 2004
|
|
“
Hamilton Tiger-Cats player Julian Radlein
turned down a lucrative job offer from the Green Bay Packers in part
because of his beliefs”, which were critical of the belligerent
U.S. policies in Iraq and Haiti as well as the Son of Star Wars
strategy.
It takes guts to play pro-football but even more to stick to
your principles. Another
reason to be a Ti-Cat fan. September
11, 2004
|
|
Now
that our Federal provincial tug of war on Health care funding is
over, I am waiting for the other shoe to drop. You can’t get away
from the fact that resources are limited; what you give extra in one
area you must take away from another. What
will suffer as the left shoe hits the floor?
Education, Infrastructure, Cities?
Most likely Foreign Aid, Sports and the Arts spending will
be cut drastically.
Now more than ever, we must not join the Americans
in costly ‘defence’ ventures designed to prop up a
post-cold war military-industrial complex. September
16, 2004
|
|
There
are many ethical
problems inherent in condoning voluntary suicide near life’s end.
The clearest to me is that mistakes happen and may be deliberate
‘mistakes’ by
others whose interests conflict with the person ending his/her life.
I have the same problem with the state exercising the death penalty.
The ultimate mistake
brooks no recourse.
As long as there is inheritance, voluntary suicide by the elderly
will always be suspect. Motive, Means and
Opportunity
become all too convenient when the victim is suffering from
dementia. September
16, 2004
|
|
I
think this would be a good time to repatriate the game of hockey. Games
of a Canadian League of 12 teams ( allowing
Hamilton and Halifax the opportunity they deserve ) would be better
attended than in
Nashville
.
We have a year to entice our own boys (
and girls?) to make of a CHL what the CFL
is, a more interesting sports experience than what’s
offered in the States.
As far as Sir Stanley’s Cup,
maybe the GG, Adrienne Clarkson can lend her name to
such a silver trophy .
This is a window of opportunity.
Let’s take it! September
17, 2004
|
|
Selling
government owned buildings only makes fiscal sense if we intend to
shrink the government, reduce the role of government, and cease
providing services to the taxpayers of this country.
That must be PM Martin’s plan as he has promised so much to
the Provinces for Health Care and, without a proportional tax hike,
the money must come from somewhere else: i.e. dropped
programming, gutted
departments and reduced service.
The PSA has every right to be fearful; their jobs en masse
are probably on the line. But
it is a political decision not just a question of asset management.
It didn’t take long for the other shoe to drop.
One week between the Health agreement and Brisson’s
announcement. September
22, 2004
|
|
Rather
biased If
CBS is to be fined for showing something obscene to the public,
shouldn’t all the networks be penalized for
broadcasting the Republican National Convention? September
23, 2004
|
|
Thank
you for your item on asymmetry and the bully boys
.. even more frightening, for those of us still clinging to
the romance of democratic principles, is yesterday’s announcement
that CBS is shelving the Bradley piece, a report on America’s
justifications for going to war in Iraq.
“
Democracy
is on the march” is Bush’s mantra for the
US
electorate… but it seems to be marching backwards.
CBS claims delving into the reasons Bush sent his armies off
to was “inappropriate” leading
up to an election.
What could possibly be more appropriate?
Did their leaders lie them into a war?
What’s
the real reason the
US
is there? (
I am just now reading Linda McQuaig’s
latest work, “ It’s the Crude, Dude “ )
Which
sponsors are putting pressure on CBS?
I
have relative in the States. I
am afraid I will have to visit via e-mail / phone and letter. I
am seriously afraid to cross the border these days.
September
26, 2004
|
|
It
seems suspect singer (turned-Muslim), Cat
Stevens was prescient when years ago he wrote that he was being
followed by a moon-shadow. A
climate of fear grows. I
am reminded of my childhood growing up in the
United
States
in the 1950s. September
26, 2004
|
|
Only
one extra year? Too bad.
Canada
has been well served by Adrienne Clarkson as Governor General.
She has made the role a touch-stone of Canadian culture, if
not as reflection perhaps, but as aspiration.
For Ms Clarkson as GG is intelligent, refined, cultured,
sympathetic and generous; in a word, Her Majesty’s representative
in
Canada
.
The Governor General is supposed to be ‘above’ us in the
best sense of the word, a star. Ad
aster, per asper! October 2, 2004
|
|
So
the New York Times judges
Canada
to be a faded flower.
Their article cites
Canada
’s “
uninspired leaders … lack of national purpose, stunted
imagination, and befuddled priorities….”
Tomorrow we
will hear the speech from the throne. Our
government’s latest expression of a vision for
Canada
may not be as
strident as a George W. Bush’s State of the Union Address, but
bombast and demagoguery do not constitute vision.
It’s also important to not lie when leading a nation,
focusing on our national purpose, inspiring imaginative vision and
setting priorities to achieve that vision. October
4, 2004
|
|
Letter
writer, JOHN
McCAFFERY poses marriage as the closing
of a loop by God to bring Man and Woman together.
He says only a fool would deny this ‘absolute truth’.
I thought sex brought people
together, for the most part men and women. But in the case of gays
and lesbians, it
brings Man and Man together and Woman and Woman
together.
As to ‘absolute truth’, God
protect us all from the folly of those
espousing absolute truths. October
7, 2004
|
|
So
Alberta Premier, Ralph Klein is giving his B.C. counterpart some
tips on how to become debt free. Live within your means annually. Pay
down your ‘mortgage’ regularly. Parsimony
and prudence, eh?
He seems to have forgotten the best advice of all:
sit on a hell of a lot of oil when crude sells for $53 (
US
)
a barrel. October
9, 2004
|
|
US
President G.W. Bush means what he says!
He repeated that at least five times during the first
televised debate. So when he says, “take
advantage of our fantastic, opportunistic society”,
it’s not a malapropism.
He
may be referring to his foreign policy or his VP’s business track
record. “
“Fantastic”, as in his rationale for waging
war; “opportunistic” as a good
description of the real
reasons for same.
“George
W. Bush” and
“Crude” they go
together! October
9, 2004 |
|
Ken
Wiwa seems to think a second Bush term
will mean the end of ultra-conservatism in American politics. The
German Communists thought the same way in the 1930s;
” After Hitler, us” was their catchphrase.
And we all know how well that turned out.
Another line comes to mind, “ the
operation was a success but the patient died.” October
30, 2004
|
|
Senryu
: 5 – 7 – 5
syllable pattern
as in haiku. ( haiku is traditionally
more ethereal and refers to nature, senryu
is drier )
Three examples:
Can(pol)Lit
-
Sponsorship scandal:/
Many showed to
share the loot./
None to share
the blame.
Amerika
duh booty full
- Earth money, dig it!/
But if all you do is take,/
the
gold turns to lead.
Personal
Pleasure
- Laughter of children
/ Quiet smiles on old faces
/ Music to my ears.
October
31, 2004
|
| I
do not understand why Stephen Harper accuses Liberal MPs of being
‘anti-American’. From quotes I’ve heard, including those of
Carolyn Parrish, criticism has been tame compared with what many
Americans had to say. The press has gone on and on about
America
’s
polarization and deep felt emotions of this campaign.
Are 47% of Americans anti-American?
More to the point, had the Ohio results been different and
Kerry had won the White House, would Stephen Harper be
considered ‘anti-American’ for policy statements closer to those
of the Republicans than of those of the Democrats? November 4,
2004
|
|
Margaret
Wente notes that,
put to a popular vote, gay marriage would not pass. True:
in
Canada
or most elsewhere, I believe.
When
I was in college, 40 years ago,
there was a survey done in
middle
America
;
it was a broad poll
asking how you felt about certain
issues. It was a
trick, of course,
the results showed 80 % of Americans, if polled, would
gladly abolish the Bill
of Rights.
Which is why we do not govern by referendum (
except in
California
).
As
I was raised a secular humanist I am an admirer of critical thought.
Being human, my heart is on the left! I
am insulted by the religious right who say I have no values.
I have my values, decidedly not theirs.
Thank God. November 7, 2004
|
|
Lisa
Evans decries the unconscionable plans
to make a
Hollywood
movie out
the tragedy that was Bernardo/Homolka. She
asks, “ When will
morality supersede the drive for profit? “
When the human race does not produce monsters like Paul
Bernardo and Karla Homolka,
or war mongers like Krup
or Haliburton . Profiteers
always put their greed
( sexual or financial ) above consideration for anyone
else, and regardless of the consequences. November
14, 2004 |
|
Books
for Bush Perhaps
even more obvious reading for President Bush would be the comic
strip Pogo, wherein he might glean the wisdom, “
We have met the enemy and it is us.” November
17, 2004
|
|
Joanna
Manning would rather President G.W. Bush be greeted by
Carolyn Parrish
than by the PM, lest Paul Martin become another one of “Bush’s
poodles”.
Great! A pet poodle or a barking bitch; is this
the best we can do? How
about a statesman ( not a ‘State’s
man ) with a sense of civility and a backbone too? November
18, 2004
|
|
On
The House ( CBC Radio) I just heard Carolyn Parrish explain
her self, her situation and her views.
In dropping her from caucus ( why do the
media pundits say ‘fire’ ? ) the PM
got it right in a perverse way, I think.
Ms Parrish had to be thrown from the Liberal Party only after
disavowing the party, it’s leader and
her caucus solidarity. I’d
have thrown her out too..
That fact that she was not disciplined for her
anti-Bush remarks ( as funny or crude or uncivil as they were )
underscores the (small ‘l’ ) liberal philosophy of the party and
still sticks it to the Bushies while
appearing to be
toadying to them.. How Liberal ( big
‘L’ ) can you get?
As some (
herself included ) have pointed out,
Parrish as an independent MP will hold more power now, get
once a week guaranteed Question Period Time ( government
backbenchers might get 2 questions a year, if they’re lucky or
bother to show up ).
Has PM Paul Martin done this deliberately?
( grassy knoll, here we come )
He
has accommodated the right-wing in Canada, pleased the left,
admonished a thorn in his party’s side,
looked like a banana-republic toady to Bush and thugs while
at once pretending to be strong in caucus but at the same time
tolerant of MP-backbench views.
Martin did all this while teetering on the high-wire of Minority
government. Carolyn was the ballast
that, once jettisoned, helps keep him up there.
No
wonder they are the Natural Governing Party of Canada. November
20, 2004
|
|
Ms
Rowntree fears Provincial and federal
governments will ‘pander to voters’ and not provide the money
for services which autistic children need.
What governments do is:
- act
within fiscal reality
- set
priorities
- meet
the needs of their constituents as best they can
The courts may intervene to
mandate rights but they do so, wisely, with an understanding of the
role and limits of government.
Judicial Activism must work within the principles of
responsible government and democratic process. November 24, 2004
|
|
In
1990 I locked into a five year mortgage at 13.5%
, only to see interest rates plummet to near nothing over the
next five years. I was
kicking myself, to be sure. But
I wasn’t blaming the Royal Bank and I certainly was not demanding
that the government compensate me for my error.
I applaud our national approach which tries to offset inequities and
bring about balance. It is a testimony to the good will of
Canada
.
But please, one province proclaiming, “
je me souviens
“ is enough!
November 26, 2004
|
|
Dave
Ashby fears the battle for good grammar is all but lost. He
has good reason to fear. A
few years ago I was in a local elementary school on my way to a
meeting with
the principal. I
passed a bulletin display of cut-out letters and images which
proclaimed, “ April Showers Brings May
Flowers”. I asked a
teacher who happened to be in the hall to correct the error.
I jokingly said, “ Perhaps the
person who put this up thought “showers” was a collective
singular.” This
teacher’s response was,
“Huh? “ I told him
how it should read. He
grabbed the offending ‘s’
from off ‘brings’, crumpled it and said,. “
So, is that better? Are you happy now? “
and stomped off.
I imagine he didn’t know about agreement of subject and predicate;
his students won’t be any the wiser either. November 26,
2004
|
|
Letter
writer, DAN
NYZNIK wants to know if the government allows tobacco because it’s
hooked on tax revenues. Partly
so. The tobacco
lobby in the
United
States
is strong enough to force the issue even without the added incentive
of an
easy tax grab. The industry has billions of dollars and the
‘undying’ ( irony intended ) support of
hundreds of millions of addicts world-wide.
The arms industry is
likewise powerful and influential and ( world-wide ) kills more
people each year than the tobacco industry. Perhaps
the American taxpayer should be comforted in knowing
tobacco-generated taxes will be going to pay for the Bush Missile
Defence System which, from what I read in this paper, will likely
bring us closer to war while offering no real defence. And if this
makes you nervous, you can always have a drink or light up a …
never mind. November
27, 2004
|
|
Letter
writer Merilee Olson
wonders how to
write the plural of ‘is’. I
believe “ is’s
“ with the ‘is’ italicised but the pluralizing ‘s’ which
follows not in italics. I
quote from the web site Webster.com:
“
We use an
apostrophe to create plural forms in two limited
situations: for pluralized letters of the alphabet and when we are
trying to create the plural form of a word that refers to the word
itself…..
-
·
Jeffrey
got four A's on his last report card.
-
·
Towanda
learned very quickly to mind her p's
and q's.
-
·
You have
fifteen and's in
that last paragraph.
Notice
that we do not use an apostrophe -s
to create the plural of a word-in-itself. For instance, we would
refer to the "ins and outs" of a mystery, the "yeses
and nos" of a vote ....”
On
a further grammatical note, the Subjunctive Mood is used to express
a conditional state. Thus the confused reference to a “
Conditional Mood”. ( maybe I should get a life ) November
27, 2004
|
|
Dear
Ms Blatchford,
Re: Your column in the Saturday Globe
When doctors, governments and, God only
knows, mothers caution us to live in a healthy way, we should
take heed. The warnings are so strong because the situation has
gotten so bad. Extreme
health warnings, it seems to me, are necessary to offset the
extremes of junk
food availability and sedentary entertainment/ employment.
It is no longer enough to live by the credo, “
Move more, eat less” ( although that’s an excellent
foundation for a healthy lifestyle in affluent
North
America
). We must be more
careful than ever. Careful in
choosing foods because there’s so much non-food and downright
unhealthy fare out there and most of it is not sufficiently labeled.
Careful in consciously scheduling exercise because our lives (
work, travel and entertainment )
are geared toward ease.
The extreme urging by the medical profession and governments is
toward moderation of life style, a tipping back of the scales to a
healthy balance. It is
not (solely) motivated by our generation’s super-ego quest for
eternal youth; it’s just good sense and the sort of thing your mum
would have advised. November
28, 2004
|
|
Mr
Hinzman’s refugee claim is valid
because, unlike the
United
States
,
Canada
honours the Geneva Conventions on war. It
is not that the
Iraq
invasion is an ‘unjust war’; that would be open to
interpretation. It is
the documented, ongoing violations of
the Geneva Conventions in
Iraq
and
Guantanamo
,
sanctioned and defended by the American administration, that
makes the execution of this war illegal and immoral.
Hinzman
has grounds for refugee status. December 2, 2004
|
|
Letter
writer Hannah Parish wonders who will speak for
Canada
now that Great Canadian Voices such as Douglas,
Trudeau, Gzowski,
Burton et al are
silenced. I believe, in a democracy, each of us has the opportunity
to do so. Who will be
‘great’ at it? Time
and circumstance will tell. But it is worth noting that the Canadian
people chose David Suzuki as one of the top ten ‘greats’ ;
Conrad Black was nowhere on the list.
That says something about how we see ‘greatness’ and
that, in and of itself, is a hopeful sign. December
2, 2004
|
|
It
was a case of naked threats from the Emperor who has no clothes.
That’s what we saw in the bushwhacking news conference
where the
US
president all but demanded we join in his Missile Defence Program.
We shouldn’t be surprised. It’s
the Bush Doctrine: The
right to pre-emptive attack, the right to say who is a threat /
enemy; the simplistic “ You’re either
with us or against us “ philosophy.
And
based on what logic? “
We know we’re right so we don’t have to prove it.
Just like we know there’s
WMD
in
Iraq
so don’t waste time looking for them.
We have faith in BMD so we don’t need proof that it can
work. If you don’t
like that thinking, you must be our enemy; and because you are the
enemy, your arguments are invalid. ”
This is all tautology; dare I say it, an axiom of evil.
Mr.
Martin, it may be expedient to give the schoolyard bully your lunch
money; that doesn’t make it right.
Do the right thing. December
3, 2004
|
|
Daniel
J. Stone objects to the Globe repeating gutter
language like ‘ rat’s ass’. He says such language befits the
graffiti on the walls of steamier parts of
Toronto
.
Shucks! It has been a
long time since I visited
Toronto
.
I guess punks there
have cleaned up their act. December
4, 2004
|
| Jane
Taber’s Hot or Not
segment this week mentions Tories in Thongs.
This is not surprising as the Conservatives have always
emphasized the importance of the private sector. December
4, 2004
|
|
The
Social Conservative reaction to this week’s Supreme Court
ruling on
same-sex marriage was predictable and sad. They oppose social change
on the grounds that it is an attack on
Canada
’s
social values. Social Conservatives have been doing this for a long
time. It was they who fought against universal
medicare; for fifty years they said
giving women the vote would destroy the family; American social
conservatives of their day knew it was God’s will that they be
allowed to own slaves.
The Supreme Court has affirmed our Constitution as a living
document. They have shown Grace under fire from
the Social Conservatives; it’s time for Parliament
to show it has the political Will.
For Will and Grace, do the right thing. December
10, 2004
|
|
Letter
writer, Jake Wilson asks,
“ Did men get to
choose if women got the vote?’
Yes. Men and only men were allowed to vote on that issue.
That’s why that particular struggle, begun in the
1840s in the
United
States
,
took about 75 years to win.
December 13, 2004
|
|
Letter
writer, Al MacLachlan is angry at Jack
Layton for demanding party unity over same-sex
legislation in the Commons. Mr. MacLachlan
says the
NDP is not allowing a free vote.
But their members are free to vote “
according to conscience of wishes of their constituents”;
they just can’t call themselves New Democrats if they vote
against what their leader clearly sees as a fundamental party
policy.
John Nunziata was free to vote against
his government’s budget. “ Freedom”
does not mean you don’t have to pay a price; it means you are free
to act and suffer the consequences. Sort
of like life.
December 13, 2004
|
|
Globe Columnist
Murray Campbell asks, “ So why not grandfather these
rooms? Make them unpleasant, make their patrons come out and get
their own drinks and food so no servers have to go in.”
I
suspect the reason for not going this route is that making
exceptions would threaten to undermine the
impetus toward change.
When trying to change a cultural mind-set, it is advisable to
send a steady, clear and unequivocal message. It
took but a couple years of hard headed ( hearted
?) enforcement in
Ontario
and now buckling up has
become automatic.
The not drinking/driving campaign would have faltered had we been
wishy-washy on enforcement. Parents are told how to mete out
discipline: Say what you mean, mean what you say, and don’t be
mean when you say it.
As a Town Councillor, I am proud of our
town’s recent non-smoking by-law .
The moves planned by Queen’s Park will help us make it a
success. December
16, 2004
|
|
Mad
dogs and Canadians All this brouhaha in the main
stream media over PM Martin meeting and shaking hands with Lybia’s
Col. Gadhafi.
Where was the
media indignation when
then PM Chretien met with
Indonesia
’s
Suhartro in
Vancouver
a few years back? Then
only street protesters objected to such a ‘
handshake with the devil’ and they were pepper sprayed for
their audacity. December
21, 2004
|
|
Jeffery
Simpson’s editorial, Scandal of squandered skills, has me baffled.
While agreeing with his premise about the need to overhaul
immigration policy, I find his critique of the Prime Minister’s
aid to cities / communities a contradiction.
On the one hand, Simpson decries a ‘diluted’ community agenda (
spreading financial support beyond
the borders of major cities ) and, on the other, he points
out that immigrants with needed skills should be encouraged to
settle in places other than
Toronto
,
Vancouver
and
Montreal
.
How
can we attract them to our small towns when our infrastructure,
transportation systems, roads etc. are left in dire need due to lack
of funding? December
22, 2004
|
|
The
Canadian flag is removed from provincial buildings in
Newfoundland
and
Labrador?
Why
stop at symbols?
I
expect Premier Williams will have the equalization rebate cheque in
the mail already. December
24, 2004
|
|
Worst
contest continues Letter
writers Wilson and Atkinson have proposed two nominees for the
world’s worst sentences. On
what grounds, I wonder? Is it lack of clarity or simply that they
are run-on sentences? Is
it structure or effect that offends?
I nominate, not a specific instance, but a genre of prose:
Directions on how to fill out Federal or Provincial
government forms. December 28, 2004
|